Showing posts with label Education News/Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education News/Issues. Show all posts

05 November 2015

You Are Not On The Moon, You Are In This World


... English was no longer the language of “our former colonial masters” but an international language. 
... Malaysians should not shut themselves out from the rest of the world. “You are not on the moon. You are in this world.” 

Tan Sri Adenan Satem
Sarawak Chief Minister
Read more here.

21 October 2014

See The Problem...!



22 December 2013

'A' Meningkatkan, PISA / TIMSS Merosot .... !


Seorang Ahli Parlimen mempersoalkan kenapa terdapat perbezaan persepsi dalam sistem pendidikan Malaysia dalam pengamatan kerajaan dan badan antarabangsa, seperti PISA dan TIMSS.

Baca lagi di sini.

Apa menda ni...?






















Bagi ramai kaum guru, perkara camni sememang memanaskan dan memerahkan telinga,
Apa lagi dia orang mau?
Cetakan Biru pun dah dibuat,
bermacam-macam strategik telah dimuatkan...,
dan
disusun dan dibind dengan sungguh cantik....!

23 November 2013

Matematik Tambahan Bocor?


Kertas soalan Matematik, Matematik Tambahan SPM 2013 didakwa bocor.....!

Baca seterusnya di sini.

Gara-gara dari;

1.  budaya nak cemerlang, ganjaran dan sanjungan hanya kepada yang cemerlang .... maka matlamat akhir menghalalkan sebarang cara atau tindakan.

2.  pusat tusyen atau guru-guru tusyen yang tidak puas nak kaut keuntungan yang melimpah-limpah dengan mengadakan seminar-seminar atau bengkel-bengkel menjawab soalan peperiksaan pada saat-saat akhir kononnya untuk membantu calon-calon melakukan pecutan, lompatan, macam-macam lagi saujana impian....!!! Pusat-pusat tusyen atau guru-guru tusyen bersaorangan yang boleh memberikan kelebihan ini akan menjadi popular dan menjadi tumpuan kepada bakal calon-calon masa akan datang... maka keuntungan dari yuran tusyen akan melimpah-limpah datang.... malah boleh menaikkan yuran tanpa banyak bantahan dari calon-calon dan ibubapa.

3. sikap calon-calon (termasuk juga sebahagian ibubapa) yang kiasu yang tidak yakin dengan kebolehan sendiri (anak mereka) dan yang suka buat 'short-cut' menjelang peperiksaan. Dari pemerhatian, sebahagian besar calon-calon yang suka buat 'short-cut' ini adalah terdiri daripada mereka yang tidak memberi tumpuan semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran (PdP) di dalam bilik darjah di sekolah, tidak membuat latihan, tidur dalam kelas dan angkuh dengan tusyen yang mereka hadiri seolah-olah pusat tusyen atau guru tusyen mereka ada 'magic' yang boleh memberi jaminan bahawa mereka pasti akan lulus dengan cemerlang kerana mereka telah membayar yuran untuk tusyen. Tetapi di sekolah tiada bayaran dikenakan maka tiada 'magic' jaminan untuk lulus, maka boleh  membuat 'kacau' atau 'engkar perintah' semasa PdP di dalam bilik darjah.

Di sekolah, setiap tahun guru-guru menghadapi masalah dari calon-calon seperti ini, langsung menjatuhkan semangat dan keghairahan untuk mengajar. Bukan itu sahaja, guru-guru di sekolah berhempas pulas memikirkan dan 'dikejar' untuk menyediakan dan melaksanakan pelbagai program peningkatan prestasi bagi membantu calon-calon menghadapi peperiksaan dan juga supaya sekolah tidak terjerumus dan dicop sebagai sekolah berprestasi rendah (SPR). Dokumen-dokumen yang tebal-tebal yang mengandungi rahsia atau jamu strategik untuk peningkatan prestasi dijilid dengan cantik seolah-olah dengan demikian rahsia atau jamu itu akan mengena dan berkesan untuk meningkatkan prestasi.

Walaupun demikian respon dari calon-calon yang akan menduduki peperiksaan terhadap pelaksanaan program-program peningkatan prestasi yang telah dirancang amatlah menyedihkan. Dokumen yang cantik atau apa-apa bentuk persembahan dokumen yang baru pun tidak dapat mengubah calon-calon sedemikian. Apabila keputuan peperiksaan diumumkan, pihak berkuasa di atas sana akan menggunakan keputusan peperiksaan tersebut untuk mencari dan men'cop' SPR, seolah-seolah guru-guru di SPR ini tidak mengajar atau tidak tahu mengajar .....!

Matlamat menghalalkan cara.... maka cara penipuan adalah 'short cut' terbaik... maka meniru dan mem'bocor'kan soalan adalah caranya.... Bukan setakat peperiksaan awam kebangsaan sahaja, peperiksaan peringkat sekolah, daerah atau negeri suatu yang lumrah. Pengurusan sekolah dan pihak berkuasa pendidikan yang lain pening kepala tetapi pihak di luar sana seperti pusat-pusat tusyen dan pemberi-pemberi tusyen persaorangan yang telah 'mencuri' tugas-tugas profesional guru, berketawa besar sambil mengendong karung berisi wang masuk ke dalam bank....



23 March 2012

Five Degrees In-Demand With Employers

College Degrees Employers Want Most

By Lisa Manterfield - Read more here.

Want to know which degrees are linked to stellar career opportunities?

Let's look to the National Association of Colleges and Employers' (NACE) "Job Outlook 2012" survey for clues. The annual survey is a forecast of employers' intentions to hire new college graduates.

Each year, many of the same degrees - business, engineering, and computer science - make it to the top of the hiring list. But why?

"In some cases companies are looking for a specific skill set unique to a position," says Andrea Koncz, employment information manager at NACE. "Computer science, for example, requires a specific technical knowledge."

Want to ensure you earn an in-demand degree? Keep reading to see which degrees are standing out to employers this year.


Degree #1 - Business Administration

If you're interested in earning an in-demand degree that can help you learn about business policy and strategy, a bachelor's degree in business administration could be a great option.

NACE's Job Outlook 2012 survey found that 48.5 percent of employers who responded to the survey plan to hire business majors, many of whom might study topics like accounting, marketing, human resources, and law.

Click to Find the Right Business Administration Program.

Why it's in demand: According to the Job Outlook survey, employers prefer candidates who have problem solving and leadership skills, which could potentially be acquired or honed through a business program, notes the Colleges Board, an organization that administers academic aptitude tests like the SAT. Business classes could also give students a broad understanding of business practices that might be used in industries ranging from finance to health care.

Potential careers:*

  • Human Resources Manager
  • Financial Analyst
  • Financial Manager

Do you like to figure out how things are built and what makes certain things run? Consider pursuing an engineering bachelor's degree, which is a hot hiring field, according to NACE's Job Outlook survey.

Of the surveyed employers, 51.5 percent plan to hire electrical engineering grads; 50 percent anticipate hiring mechanical engineering grads; and 43.3 percent have plans to hire computer engineering grads.

Why it's in demand: Graduates in all engineering fields acquire in-demand skills such as problem solving and analysis according to the U.S. Department of Labor. These sought-after skills could transfer to a range of careers.

Potential careers:*

  • Environmental Engineer
  • Petroleum Engineer
  • Biomedical Engineer

Degree #3 - Computer and Information Sciences

Computer science bachelor's degree graduates are in luck. Their tech-savvy skills are appealing to many employers, according to the Job Outlook survey.

Computer science majors, who usually study technical subjects like computer programming, operating systems, and database or software engineering, are expected to have a great hiring year, with 59.3 percent of surveyed employers planning to hire them.

Click to Find the Right Computer and Information Systems Program.

Why it's in demand: As Koncz says, computer science graduates have a particular technical skill set that is unique to that position. What's more, the U.S. Department of Labor also notes that "as technology advances, employers will need workers with the latest skills," and a computer and information sciences degree could help provide students the skill-set they want.

Potential careers:*

* Software Engineering
* Computer Programmer
* Computer Systems Analyst

Degree #4 - Accounting

Do you want to pursue an in-demand degree that can help hone your all-about-numbers talents? If so, consider earning a bachelor's degree in accounting.

Accounting majors, who usually study topics like accounting basics, computer skills, and document processing, have a bright 2012 outlook, with 59.3 percent of surveyed employers planning to take on these graduates this year.

Click to Find the Right Accounting Program.

Why it's in demand: One reason for the demand, according to Koncz, is that accounting majors develop strong analytical skills that employers seek. The U.S. Department of Labor also notes that accounting and auditing hopefuls "should have an aptitude for mathematics and be able to analyze, compare, and interpret facts and figures quickly," which are skills that could be acquired in earning a degree in this area.

Potential careers: *

  • Accountant
  • Budget Analyst
  • Financial Manager

Degree #5 - Economics

Want to figure out why the economy is in such a rut? A bachelor's degree in economics might help you form some hypotheses. And to top it off, it's also a popular degree among employers.

In fact, according to the Job Outlook survey, economics degree grads have the attention of some 34 percent of surveyed employers who plan to hire them in 2012.

Why it's in demand: Economics majors generally take classes in mathematics, statistics, and finance, learning to "analyze how the seemingly simple acts of buying and selling can be complicated by factors such as taxes, interest rates," says the College Board. Through such a program, students could acquire abilities in data analysis, which places high in the desirable skills employers are looking for, according to the Job Outlook survey.

Potential careers: *

  • Personal Financial Advisor
  • Loan Officer
  • Financial Analyst

01 January 2012

After 50 Years in School
















Source: An email from Simon Ng

20 November 2011

Usual Disguising or Camouflage Act


Another weakness in decision making process.
Another stupid testing ground to gauge people's feeling, judgement and reaction.
Another sandiwara to boast artificial self good image or fake high ability to listen and to consider people's reaction by reversing the decision.
Another syok sendiri and arrogance decision to show but to abuse it's administrative power.

The same pattern also exhibited at the implementation level but here it's worse because the little napoleons seem to be mute but very highly syok sendiri and easily get irritated due to their own perception that their power being challenged.

Only fools will grab the offer, praise and applause them!
Surely there are some chameleons smelling for opportunities.

Read more here.

28 August 2011

To Whom It May Concern - Please Small Class Sizes


The Answer for Education: Small Class Sizes

by Mhaire Fraser
August 27, 2011


Seven of my teacher friends emailed this to me to write about.

Every single one of them said the same thing: ”Please write about this. Please get it posted. Please tell people we said this will work here. Here in America, supposedly the most progressive thinking country in the world.” And they all included the link to the Smithsonian’s article on Finland’s schools and why they are so successful. Here is the short answer from all of them:

Small. Class. Sizes.

There is never enough money for education and it is no longer “no child left behind,” but a whole country being left behind. Because we don’t spend enough on teachers and we don’t hire enough of them and we don’t think it matters when it comes to the budgets of our states. California and North Carolina are both notable for this. For instance, twenty two percent of all North Carolinians have difficulty with reading or writing that seriously affect their daily lives. The lawmakers are okay with this.

The teachers are not the problem.
The students are not the problem.
The testing is not the problem.
The overly large amount of students being put into a single classroom is the problem.


The funny thing is, this seems to have been going on for a long time.

Finnish schooling became a source of controversy after the 2010 documentary film Waiting for “Superman” contrasted it with America’s troubled public schools. In Finland, most schools are small enough so that all the teachers know every student. If one method fails, a group consult happens to try something else. And the Smithsonian reports that almost 30 percent of Finland’s school children receive some kind of special help during their first nine years of school, because special help in a hard subject will help foster learning. We have known for a while that not everyone learns the same way, even though here in America they are tested the same way.

In Finland, there is only one standard test at the end of your Senior Year. There are no comparisons, no grades, no results, no academic competitions. All schools have the same National goals and pull from the same pool of University-educated teachers, and all schools are public. This means that one can get a quality education no matter where they go to school. I just can’t see that happening here, although I wish it could.

The Finnish attitude of “whatever it takes” could work. If we have enough teachers, we will have the manpower to turn around illiteracy. If we pay the teachers, they will come. It took Finland 40 years, but we could do it. I am not sure we can get the buy in for that long, neither from lawmakers or parents who wants things like grades and marks to make sure Little Johnny is on track (I always ask “on track for what?”).

So to my teacher friends at all levels, including my college colleagues: I’m with you. I know. Maybe we can’t turn around the whole system quickly, but we can ask for small class sizes and more money for education.

I’m with them. You with me?

P/S: Dear Mhaire Fraser, I am with you too!

Read more here:


03 July 2011

MOE Reply to Unhappy Teacher


Ministry of Education (MOE) would like to refer to an article by Unhappy Teacher, published in THE STAR dated 19 Jun 2011 on the issue of Senior teachers sidelined.
Lately, MOE has received a lot of complaints from teachers, expressing their dissappointment in the Ministry for not giving priority to senior teachers in terms of promotion.

Nevertheless, the Government believes in the policy of making the teaching profession prestigious by improving the quality of teachers and their careers, as well as making sure their welfare is taken care of. This is to ensure that the teaching profession is given a respectable place in the society as an acknowledgment for the heavy responsibility they carry in educating our future generation.

Therefore, in order to ensure that the implementation of the policy is thoroughly strong and beneficial to all teachers, the Government is currently working on the details and perfecting the implementation of the new concept as announced by the Education Minister during the celebration of Teachers Days 2011.

We would like to thank the reader for bringing this matter to our attention. The Ministry is actively working to improve service to our customers and the feedback has proved to be invaluable.

CORPORATE COMMUNICATION UNIT
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION MALAYSIA

Verify here.

01 June 2011

String of A's May Look Impressive But Not Be So In Real Life!


by Mansor Putih,
Cheras.


I CAN
write from personal experience about the issue of the top scorers at SPM or STPM. On paper, this achievement may look impressive. But in real life, it may not be so.

We have all seen over the years how those who had scored a string of A’s in their SPM and STPM examinations had not excelled beyond recognition.

There have been many among them who had been sent abroad, yet, there is no one among them who had created a stir when they were at those universities abroad, or when they returned to the country to assume posts. So few were admitted into the prestigious Ivy League and Oxbridge universities in the US and UK respectively.

If some of them had gained admission, surely, it could be considered to be an achievement. But so far not many or none among the present group of students who have got the string of A’s had bothered to even apply for admission into such universities.

If they had, and if their application for scholarship was rejected then surely, there is cause for alarm. But the truth is that these top scorers have only pieces of paper to show the A’s they got for the dozen or so subjects.

Yet, many of them can’t speak fluently in English or Bahasa Melayu. They could get the answers right, but many may not know what they are writing about.

If they really wanted to excel, then they should on their own seek admission into prestigious universities, where their qualification and personal achievements will be verified and recognised.

But all of them just want to study abroad without caring which university it is.

I did not possess an impressive academic record but I still managed to gain admission into an Ivy League university in New York City. The university was impressed with my academic achievements and extracurricular activities and other personal interests and hobbies. Its officials also took into consideration all these things other than the academic qualification I had then.

Yet, Mara officials still chose to reject my application for a scholarship. I had to work for a year, before I was given a study loan the following year after an appeal.

Verify here.Link


09 May 2011

Aduhai!... Sekolah Ganti Hari Sabtu

Buat kerja yang tiada makna! Datang bekerja semata-mata memenuhi syarat untuk hadir tetapi kerja yang dibuat tidak seperti yang diobjektifkan.

Itulah keadaan sekolah ganti hari Sabtu. Entah berapa kali sekolah ganti hari Sabtu telah dibuat., saya pun tak ingat, lantaklah.... Yang terakhir ialah Sabtu lepas 7 Mei 2011 kerana mengganti perayaan Deepavali pada bulan November 2011. Sebelum ini sekolah ganti hari Sabtu seperti ini telah dijalankan bagi menggantikan Perayaan Tahun Baru Cina pada bulan Februari lepas dan Raya Aidil Fitri pada September 2011 nanti.

Baik betul pihak berkuasa di KPM kerana prihatin dengan perasaan para guru dan murid yang ingin merayakan perayaan masing-masing dalam tempoh yang panjang. Maka sekolah ganti Sabtu dirancang dengan awal.

Tapi, tidak pasti sama ada pihak berkuasa berkaitan dengan pelajaran atau pendidikan sedar bahawa kehadiran murid pada sekolah ganti hari Sabtu itu sangat mengecewakan! Ada kelas yang tiada langsung murid yang hadir.

Guru-guru sentiasa diingatkan melakukan penambahbaikan ke atas sesuatu program pendidikan yang telah dilaksanakan atau membuat kajian tindakan untuk mengatasi kelemahan atau masalah dalam pendidikan yang dikenal pasti.

Nah! Ini dia masalah yang nyata terpampang di depan mata iaitu majoriti murid yang tidak hadir ke sekolah ganti hari Sabtu. Apakah pihak yang berwajib telah melakukan kajian tindakan bagi mengatasi masalah ini?

Agak mudah sahaja bagi pihak berwajib iaitu mengarahkan pihak pengurusan sekolah berfikir di luar kotak dan bertindak dengan luar dari biasa bagi menarik murid-murid hadir ke sekolah pada sekolah ganti hari Sabtu. Mengarah memanglah senang, tapi bagi pihak yang melaksanakannya.... adakah pihak berwajib itu sedar seksanya!

Pihak pengurusan sekolah tidak boleh disalahkan 100% dalam perkara ini kerana mereka telah melakukan pelbagai cara bagi menggalakkan murid hadir ke sekolah, tetapi majoriti murid masih tidak mahu hadir ke sekolah ganti hari Sabtu. Ada sekolah yang sudah ketandusan idea. Idea bukan senang datang begitu sahaja. Adakala idea yang dilaksanakan memakan diri seperti mendapat tentangan pihak-pihak tertentu, terutama dari ibu bapa atau penjaga.

Apa pun, soalnya, adakah pihak berwajib telah melakukan kajian tindakan bagi mengatasi masalah ketidakhadiran murid-murid pada sekolah ganti hari Sabtu, sebagaimana guru-guru sentiasa diingatkan melakukan kajian tindakan?

Ada guru yang sudah menyindir, seperti ketam mengajar anaknya berjalan betul!

Satu pandangan... apakah salahnya kaedah yang telah dilaksanakan pada tahun-tahun 1990'an dan awal 2000'an di mana penetapan cuti persekolahan di fleksibel dengan mengambil kira cuti perayaan iaitu menetapkan cuti persekolahan pada cuti perayaan yang panjang itu. Tidak timbul pun soal sekolah ganti hari Sabtu dan masalah ramai murid tidak hadir pada sekolah ganti itu.

Kini timbul pula satu rungutan dari para guru, iaitu guru tidak lagi dapat menikmati cuti pada hari Sabtu kerana kena hadir hampir setiap hari Sabtu untuk aktiviti sekolah ganti dan majlis-majlis lain anjuran sekolah dan pihak-pihak berkuasa pendidikan yang lain! Perjuangan para guru untuk mendapatkan cuti hari Sabtu kini dinikmati dengan sepenuhnya oleh penjawat-penjawat awam yag lain. Alahai guru... padan muka kamu!

15 March 2011

English is Equally Foreign to All of Us


Read the opinion by Tunku Munawirah Putra, the Secretary of PAGE regarding English in our education system published in The Star for mutual mental consumption.

To read, please click here.

21 February 2011

Non-Level Playing Field in Judging of Top Schools

An opinion by a PIBG in Petaling Jaya.

Monday February 21, 2011

Judging of top schools not done fairly

A few years back, “performing schools” were accorded the title Sekolah Harapan Negara and later Sekolah Cemerlang. These schools were given monetary rewards.

Not long after that, the Education Minister announced the “cluster schools”.

The reward was RM500,000 per school. Now they have been rebranded as “Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi” with an award of RM700,000.

If one were to go through the records, it can be seen that the same schools are benefiting every year.

Most of the schools are in big towns or boarding schools. The day schools seem to be left behind.

A school principal once commented “It’s a futile exercise for us and we are fed up! Year after year, we are chasing for the moon!”

Just look at the present 23 schools selected and you will see the trend.

We can guess what type of schools will be selected next year.

For the so-called elite or boarding schools, it is plain sailing as they have good students while we toil with the leftovers.

There is no control on day school intakes.

For instance, good primary schools in “elite” areas will have to accommodate foreigners who hardly speak Bahasa Malaysia or English.

Sometimes the district offices transfer students from Band 7 schools (weak schools) to promising schools and this frustrates the teachers who have nurtured their students from day one.

Look at the big schools in town areas that have between 700 and 1,000 students and with a class of 40 students.

How can one compare this to a rural school, such as in Ulu Lubai in Sarawak, where the number of students and teachers in the school are 30 and 12 respectively?

The school’s core business is to provide a good education to the students. Giving monetary rewards on a non-level playing field is demoralising, especially if it is done repeatedly.

PIBG,
Petaling Jaya.


Replace Moral Lesson...

An opinion from Mr. David Tih, Malacca.

Monday February 21, 2011

Replace Moral lessons with religious classes

.....Things that stand in the way of inter-religious harmony include: inadequate knowledge, misunderstanding, insensitivity, intolerance and bigotry.

In this context, I would like to suggest that the Government abolishes existing Moral classes and replace them with religious classes for all non-Muslim students – Buddhism for Buddhists, Christianity for Christians , Hinduism for Hindus and so on.

Also, schools can set up their own inter-faith committees to minimise misunderstanding and promote better co-operation and brotherhood among Malaysian students and help nurture them to become good citizens and responsible leaders of this great nation in the future.

It is time for us to translate the 1Malaysia concept into reality by respecting, understanding and accepting each other’s differences and moving forward together as one nation and one people.

David Tih,Malacca.

Read more here.

P/S: Things that need to be looked into if the authority agreed with the above opinion and decided to implement it;

1. Do we have enough competent and reliable non-Islamic teachers to teach in our schools. Do we have enough manpower that really well verse in the teaching of their respective religions . Do not expect the MOE to call on the monks to come to teach in our schools. It is a matter of occupation just like a teacher teaching the Islamic study and not on voluntary basis.

2. Will the MOE willing to come out with a big budget to set up teacher training centers to train non-Islamic teachers. Then how about logistic, organization and human resource within the MOE, SED, DEO and schools.


3. How about content and syllabus of each of the non-Islamic subjects. Which one to follow or to be adopted, since within each of the non-Islamic religions, there are so many sects that seem to have difficulty to accommodate to each other.

4. Would it creates conflict among students and teachers in our schools when everyone declares that the teaching of their religion is true and the best and try to ridicule others. There bound to have some teachers who undertake the teaching of their religions towards an extreme side which cannot compromise on the sanctity of their religions.



09 January 2011

Unnecessary to Have Must-Pass

This is another piece of views from Mr. Liong Kam Chong which was published in The Star, 9 January, 2011, page N34, Views.

If the recent comments on the contents of our History textbooks are true, I am worried for our young ones. The Education Ministry must act fast to correct the wrongs.

While I agree that History should be a core subject, I have my reservations about it being made a must-pass subject for Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM).

First, a compulsory pass in History, or for that matter any other subject except the languages, is making a mockery of the open certificate system proclaimed for SPM.

I can remember the pain that the Education Ministry had to go through years ago when explaining the scrapping of the then closed SPM certificate system and expounding the merits of the new open system of certification.

Does all that effort not mean anything anymore? Today, you add History; tomorrow you may want to add religious or moral studies and then Science or mathematics.

Second, do we have enough History major teachers to teach the subject competently at Form 4 and 5? The demand for quality and specialised teachers will be much more crucial and critical if the subject is made a must-pass in SPM.

Besides classroom teachers, we will need experienced and qualified question setters and answer script examiners.

Third, the thinking that making History a must-pass in SPM will raise the patriotism of our young ones is too simplistic. And we are not even talking of how patriotism can be measured.

If the contents of the History textbooks remain as they are, dissatisfaction may rise among knowledgeable parents. It will elicit exactly the opposite sentiment that the ministry hopes for.

Also, do not forget that children spend more time at home than in school. Patriotic values, whatever they may be, taught in school can easily be negated by parental opinion and influence.

If students force themselves to learn the subject just to get an SPM certificate, I do not see how that will bring about true patriotism.

Fourth, it may be interesting to know if there is another country or another education system in the world that has made a compulsory pass in History a condition for securing a public examination certificate or qualification.

The Education Ministry must do a rethink on making History a compulsory pass in SPM



02 January 2011

PMR Results Prove Success of PPSMI

PMR results prove success of PPSMI policy — Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim, PAGE

January 02, 2011

Kudos to students, teachers and schools for yet another stunning performance in the PMR. These students had learnt science and mathematics in Bahasa Malaysia for six years in primary school followed by three years in English, enduring a difficult transition period in Form 1.

The Parent Action Group for Education Malaysia (Page) is elated that highlights of the above results included significant improvements, not only in narrowing the gap between the rural-urban schools but also in Bahasa Malaysia, English language, science and mathematics.

Kudos, too, to the Ministry of Education.

This implies that after teaching science and mathematics in English for eight years to date, these teachers are now more confident and proficient in these subjects, further growing from strength to strength.

It further proves the point that the policy has not relegated Bahasa Malaysia as our national language as claimed by the detractors, and as a bonus, the application and usage of the English language through these very subjects has not only benefited the teachers but also the students in leaps and bounds.

Read more here.

28 December 2010

School Probes Are Unfair


This is a comment written by Mr. Liong Kam Chong, a former colleague when we were together as PKs in our respective SMK in Negeri Sembilan during the middle of 90s. He had served as the head of the education resource and technology unit at the NS education department before he left to do a master at a local university. He was promoted as a PK in a SMK in Seremban district upon his return from his study and barely a year or two later we lost touch as he was promoted as a principal to a reputable secondary school in Seremban town till his retirement a few years back and I left to attend a one-year headship course at IAB, Genting Highlands
(because we used to meet during our regular sessions of official meetings as PKs). Mr. Liong was the brain behind a state education department program in formulating school time table using a computer software program adopted from Singapore. Indeed I have benefited a lot from this program in which my rural school was among the earliest has used the software to build and formulate my school time table and in many of my daily school administration works. In fact he has unselfishly took the trouble and his time to coach me step by step, the first time, in building the time table.

I notice Mr. Liong is a regular contributor of comments and suggestions on education issues to the two of our main English dailies after his retirement, namely the New Straits Times and The Star. He has given many insightful, logical, out of the box, practical, etc. comments or suggestions through the dailies which I believe the education authority has taken note some of his comments and suggestions. Prior to this I have posted one his comments in this blog and I would like to add in his latest comment and suggestion regarding school rules and regulations in relation to discipline matters in schools for us to ponder. The comment was published in The Star, Tuesday, 28 December 2010, page N45, VIEWS.

Schools have rules and regulations to help prevent, contain, control and curb indiscipline among their students. Yet, students disciplinary problems continue to hound school authorities, district education offices (DEO), state education departments (SED) and the Education Ministry.

Every now and then, "shocking" cases of student indiscipline are revealed. It is also believed that many other cases are covered up. We are right to ask: "Has the handling of discipline cases by the schools thus far been effective and efficient?"

Perhaps the following concerns merit consideration. Every time an indiscipline case in school surface, we will hear of the Education Ministry asking for a report from the SED which in turn will direct the DEO to prepare the report. The DEO in turn asks the school to submit a report.

So, it is the school head who will finally write the report which is then "posted" upwards. The DEO may send an official to visit the school to hear out the headmaster and the parties concerned. But, it is the report from the school head that is final and official.

This practice raises an interesting question: Can we really believe that a school head would compose a report that is detrimental to his/her own position as head and may also hurt the image of his/her school?

Granted that a head is honest enough to give all the facts revolving around an indiscipline case, the causes and consequences of the case are subjective and can be "manipulated" to the advantage of the school authorities. And that is the report that will reach all the way to the top. No wonder, then, that in most indiscipline cases, the school is usually absolved of any wrong doing.

I think that all schools should have an ad hoc panel comprising representatives, such as from the school's PTA, the alumni association, police personnel, an official from the DEO and representative from the school office. This panel should be responsible for investigating and reporting on all indiscipline cases. Such panels will give school heads a new perspective in solving school disciplinary problems.

Also, we often hear that the number of students involved in indiscipline cases is only a minor proportion of the total number of students. Similarly, the percentage of schools involved is minimal compared with the total number of schools. These statistics are often misused to paint a rosy picture of indiscipline in schools.

The former director-general of education, Tan Sri Dr. Wan Zahid Mohammad, advocated "zero-defect" when he helmed the ministry. Perhaps our schools, DEOs and SEDs should heed this advice.

Schools, DEOs and SEDs are also quick to declare that a particular case is resolved and the file closed. It is this attitude that breeds and condones negligence and the accommodative "live and let live" attitude.

Let the New Year bring a fresh and bold approach to school discipline by all concerned stakeholders.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...